← New Search ↗ Social Card

Nora Sauer Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2006-02-02 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Sartell/Sauk Rapids High (W) USHS-MN-W 24 10 7 17 0.708 0.1138 0.1138
2020-21 Andover High USHS-MN-W 22 1 4 5 0.227 0.0365 0.0365
2021-22 Andover High USHS-MN-W 30 6 10 16 0.533 0.0856 0.0856
2022-23 Andover High USHS-MN-W 31 15 18 33 1.065 0.1710 0.1710
2023-24 Andover High USHS-MN-W 31 15 16 31 1.000 0.1606 0.1606
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 St. Thomas D1 CHA-W SO 22 3 4 7 0.318
2024-25 St. Thomas D1 CHA-W FR 21 1 3 4 0.191
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.19
2024-25 · St. Thomas
+35.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

5%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
95%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#5648
Forward overall
#237
Forward born in 2006
#1219
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.08 PPG
→ Minnesota (1.00 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Elite
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.08 PPG
→ Yale (0.52 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.92 PPG
→ Princeton (0.81 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Elite
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.92 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.89 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Minnesota ·
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Yale ·
0.517 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Princeton ·
0.812 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.