IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Lily Zohner Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2007-01-13 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Delta Hockey Academy U17 Prep CSSHL-U18W 28 7 10 17 0.607 0.1391 0.1391 — —
2023-24 Delta Hockey Acad. U18 Prep G CSSHL-U18W 22 0 16 16 0.727 0.1666 0.1666 — —
2024-25 North Shore Warriors U18 Prep CSSHL-U18W 29 9 18 27 0.931 0.2133 0.2133 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Post D1 CHA-W FR 35 2 3 5 0.143
2025-26 Post D3 — FR 35 2 3 5 0.143
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.18
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.14
2025-26 · Post
-22.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

0%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
95%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#1138
Defenseman overall
#186
Defenseman born in 2007
#101
in CSSHL-U18W

D1 Comparables

Dani Sadek
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.38 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.61 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Grace Bizal
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.16 PPG
→ Boston College (0.27 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Arianna Kosakowski
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Union
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG
Kate Hallett
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.08 PPG
→ Harvard (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Katie Robinson
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.08 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.13 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Dani Sadek
Ohio State ·
0.611 Strong D
actual D2/3 PPG
Grace Bizal
Boston College ·
0.268 Average D
actual D2/3 PPG
Arianna Kosakowski
Union ·
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.