← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jeff Foss Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1988-12-12 Country: USA
2008 · Round 6, Pick #166  ·  Nashville Predators Nashville Predators
Signed Professionally
KalPa · Liiga

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2006-07 Sioux Falls Stampede USHL 11 0 1 1 0.091 0.0536 0.0557 0.2730 0.2835
2013-14 KalPa Liiga 58 0 2 2 0.035 0.0863 0.0950 0.2966 0.3264
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2010-11 RPI D1 ECAC SR 38 3 11 14 0.368
2009-10 RPI D1 ECAC JR 39 2 7 9 0.231
2008-09 RPI D1 ECAC SO 39 2 9 11 0.282
2007-08 RPI D1 ECAC FR 38 1 3 4 0.105
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.05
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.11
2007-08 · RPI
+100.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#21572
Defenseman overall
#1765
Defenseman born in 1988

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Oswego · 2017-18
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Buffalo State · 2013-14
0.412 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Potsdam · 2005-06
0.800 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.