← New Search ↗ Social Card

Alejandra Franco Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2004-01-27 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Mahtomedi High USHS-MN-W 26 15 18 33 1.269 0.2038 0.2038
2018-19 Hill-Murray School USHS-MN-W 25 12 23 35 1.400 0.2248 0.2248
2019-20 Hill-Murray School USHS-MN-W 25 4 14 18 0.720 0.1156 0.1156
2020-21 Hill-Murray School USHS-MN-W 17 10 11 21 1.235 0.1984 0.1984
2021-22 Hill-Murray School USHS-MN-W 28 18 15 33 1.179 0.1893 0.1893
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Minnesota D1 WCHA-W SR 37 1 4 5 0.135
2024-25 Minnesota D1 WCHA-W JR 35 3 2 5 0.143
2023-24 Minnesota D1 WCHA-W SO 37 1 2 3 0.081
2022-23 Minnesota D1 WCHA-W FR 10 1 3 4 0.400
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.19
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.40
2022-23 · Minnesota
+108.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

8%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
92%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#1206
Defenseman overall
#210
Defenseman born in 2004
#850
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.16 PPG
→ Boston College (0.27 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.08 PPG
→ Harvard (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.08 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.13 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.04 PPG
→ Wisconsin (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.46 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.61 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Elite D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Boston College ·
0.268 Average D
actual D2/3 PPG
Harvard ·
0.100 Developing D
actual D2/3 PPG
Minnesota ·
0.129 Developing D
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.