Based on 40 comparable players
Most women's college players come directly from high school hockey. Junior or HS season stats below (when available on Elite Prospects).
| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-W PPG | Age-Adjusted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-21 | Minnetonka High (W) | USHS-MN-W | 23 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 | N/A | N/A |
| 2021-22 | Minnetonka High (W) | USHS-MN-W | 31 | 3 | 13 | 16 | 0.516 | 0.0779 | 0.0779 |
| 2022-23 | — | 16U-AAA-W | 9 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0.222 | 0.0794 | 0.0794 |
| 2023-24 | Shattuck-St. Mary's 19U | 19U-AAA-W | 55 | 5 | 11 | 16 | 0.291 | 0.0926 | 0.0926 |
| Season | School | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | Long Island Univ. | CHA-W | SO | 21 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 0.143 |
| 2024-25 | St. Thomas | CHA-W | FR | 27 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.037 |
| Player | League · Season · PPG | FR College PPG | School |
|---|---|---|---|
| Amanda Kimmerle | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.60 PPG | 0.059 | RPI |
| Megan Hinze | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.60 PPG | 0.182 | Minnesota State |
| Emma Turbyville | NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG | 0.040 | St. Cloud State |
| Cheyenne Harris | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG | 0.324 | Union |
| Taylor Turnquist | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG | 0.171 | Clarkson |
| Player | Junior Season · PPG | FR College PPG | School | Conference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kylie Ligday | 2022-23 · 0.81 PPG | 0.280 | Gustavus Adolphus | MIAC |
| Aubree McDonagh | 2023-24 · 0.59 PPG | 0.360 | St. Catherine | MIAC |
| Audrey McClurg | 2024-25 · 0.52 PPG | — | Concordia | MIAC |
| Jorja Jusczak | 2023-24 · 1.00 PPG | 0.240 | Saint Benedict | MIAC |
| Erika McDonald | 2016-17 · 0.54 PPG | — | Adrian | NCHA |
Women's college hockey projections draw primarily on high school and junior stats when available. Because most women go directly from HS to college, projections with limited pre-college data use conference-based priors.
NCAAe-W factors are derived from historical pre-college→NCAA-W transitions. For many players, projection confidence is lower than men's due to sparse pre-college tracking.