← New Search ↗ Social Card

Casey Coffey Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: ⚠ Missing — add in admin Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Hill-Murray School USHS-MN-W 1 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 Hill-Murray School USHS-MN-W 17 0 5 5 0.294 0.0444 0.0444
2021-22 Hill-Murray School USHS-MN-W 6 1 0 1 0.167 0.0252 0.0252
2022-23 Cretin-Derham Hall (women) USHS-MN-W 22 7 8 15 0.682 0.1030 0.1030
2023-24 Cretin-Derham Hall (women) USHS-MN-W 25 3 13 16 0.640 0.0966 0.0966
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Franklin Pierce D1 NEWHA SO 34 0 1 1 0.029
2025-26 Franklin Pierce D3 SO 34 0 1 1 0.029
2024-25 Franklin Pierce D1 NEWHA FR 27 1 4 5 0.185
2024-25 Franklin Pierce D3 FR 24 1 4 5 0.208
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.09
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.19
2024-25 · Franklin Pierce
+97.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

5%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
95%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#3131
Defenseman overall
#2453
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Union (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.60 PPG
→ RPI (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.60 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.68 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.08 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Union ·
0.324 Average D
actual D2/3 PPG
Clarkson ·
0.171 Developing D
actual D2/3 PPG
RPI ·
0.059 Developing D
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.