IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Nora Devries Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2006-12-20 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Chisago Lakes High (W) USHS-MN-W 25 0 1 1 0.040 0.0064 0.0064 — —
2020-21 Chisago Lakes High (W) USHS-MN-W 22 4 7 11 0.500 0.0803 0.0803 — —
2021-22 Chisago Lakes High (W) USHS-MN-W 27 7 18 25 0.926 0.1487 0.1487 — —
2022-23 Chisago Lakes High (W) USHS-MN-W 27 9 17 26 0.963 0.1547 0.1547 — —
2023-24 Chisago Lakes High (W) USHS-MN-W 27 8 10 18 0.667 0.1071 0.1071 — —
2024-25 Chisago Lakes High (W) USHS-MN-W 27 12 9 21 0.778 0.1249 0.1249 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 St. Thomas D1 CHA-W FR 5 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

8%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
85%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#2080
Defenseman overall
#280
Defenseman born in 2006
#1580
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

Arianna Kosakowski
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Union
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG
Taylor Flaherty
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.76 PPG
→ North Dakota
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG
Ebba Strandberg
SDHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Maine (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Allison Roethke
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ Quinnipiac
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
Kenzie Prater
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.83 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.43 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Arianna Kosakowski
Union ·
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Taylor Flaherty
North Dakota ·
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Ebba Strandberg
Maine ·
0.333 Average D
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.