IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ellie Zakrajsheck Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2006-11-03 Country: USA Height: 5'6" (167 cm)
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Breck School (W) USHS-MN-W 19 4 9 13 0.684 0.1033 0.1033 — —
2021-22 Minnetonka High (W) USHS-MN-W 31 3 7 10 0.323 0.0487 0.0487 — —
2022-23 Minnetonka High (W) USHS-MN-W 30 6 4 10 0.333 0.0503 0.0503 — —
2023-24 Minnetonka High (W) USHS-MN-W 31 9 17 26 0.839 0.1266 0.1266 — —
2024-25 Minnetonka High (W) USHS-MN-W 28 16 13 29 1.036 0.1564 0.1564 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Minnesota Duluth D1 WCHA-W FR 15 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

5%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
90%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#6438
Forward overall
#279
Forward born in 2006
#1502
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

Grace Zumwinkle
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.08 PPG
→ Minnesota (1.00 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Elite
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Chancellor
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.08 PPG
→ Yale (0.52 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Danielle Marmer
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Quinnipiac
0.18 No data
NCAAe PPG
Liz Schepers
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.12 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Average
NCAAe PPG
Carly Bullock
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.92 PPG
→ Princeton (0.81 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Elite
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Samantha Benoit
Norwich · 2015-16
0.935 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Jenna Curtis
Wisconsin-Superior · 2015-16
0.222 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Becca Kniss
Franklin Pierce · 2018-19
1.031 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.