IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jack Sadek Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1997-04-19 Country: USA
2015 · Round 7, Pick #204  ·  Minnesota Wild Minnesota Wild
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Lakeville North High USHS-MN 25 5 20 25 1.000 0.1266 0.1210 0.2429 0.2322
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Minnesota D1 BigTen SR 38 4 14 18 0.474
2017-18 Minnesota D1 BigTen JR 38 2 7 9 0.237
2016-17 Minnesota D1 BigTen SO 34 4 7 11 0.324
2015-16 Minnesota D1 BigTen FR 15 0 5 5 0.333
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.33
2015-16 · Minnesota
+191.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#3958
Defenseman overall
#862
Defenseman born in 1997
#809
in USHS-MN

D1 Comparables

Scott Savage
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Boston College (0.51 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Gage Ausmus
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Dorantes
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Trevor Hamilton
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.19 PPG
→ Miami (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Christian Wolanin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.47 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jack Walter
Saint Mary's (MN) · 2014-15
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
C.J. Walker
Wisconsin-Superior · 2016-17
0.400 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Colin Guiguet
Wisconsin-Superior · 2000-01
0.321 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.