Samuel Huo Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-07-13 Country: Canada

Set Commitment

School

Type

Date (optional)

Detected conference: () — projections will update automatically.

Notes (optional)

Projecting as:

Show:

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory

Dashed = raw PPG · ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG · ■ Green = actual college PPG

Junior Seasons

Season	Team	League	GP	G	A	Pts	PPG	NCAAe-PPG	Age-Adj	D3e-PPG	Age-Adj
2017-18	Seattle Thunderbirds	WHL	67	3	3	6	0.090	0.0436	0.0483	0.2192	0.2428
2018-19	—	WHL	65	6	10	16	0.246	0.1198	0.1269	0.6023	0.6380
2019-20	Tri-City Americans	WHL	60	12	15	27	0.450	0.2189	0.2189	1.1009	1.1009
2020-21	Tri-City Americans	WHL	18	9	10	19	1.056	0.5135	0.5135	2.5825	2.5825
2021-22	Tri-City Americans	WHL	60	30	28	58	0.967	0.4703	0.4252	2.3650	2.1383
2022-23	Univ. of British Columbia	USports-M	28	13	19	32	1.143	0.6030	0.6550	3.3501	3.6391
2023-24	Univ. of British Columbia	USports-M	24	14	19	33	1.375	0.7254	0.7500	4.0304	4.1671
2024-25	Univ. of British Columbia	USports-M	23	11	14	25	1.087	0.5735	0.5654	3.1862	3.1413

■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor) ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor) COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Seasons (Historical)

Season	School	Div	Conference	Year	GP	G	A	Pts	PPG
2025-26	Nebraska Omaha	D1	NCHC	SR	30	7	9	16	0.533

Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year

Projected PPG

0.60

before college

→

Actual FR PPG

0.53

2025-26 · Nebraska Omaha

-10.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

NCAA D1

NCAA D2/D3

98%

Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#3456

Forward overall

#126

Forward born in 2001

D2/3 Comparables

Brandon Osmundson

Utica · 2018-19

1.448 Elite

actual D2/3 PPG

Filimon Ledenkov

St. Scholastica · 2018-19

1.636 Elite

actual D2/3 PPG

Neil Trimm

Neumann · 2003-04

1.800 Elite

actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.