IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Aidan De La Gorgendiere Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2002-02-22 Country: Canada
Signed Professionally
Univ. of Alberta · USports-M

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Saskatoon Blades WHL 1 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2018-19 Saskatoon Blades WHL 47 0 5 5 0.106 0.0518 0.0565 0.2599 0.2833
2019-20 Saskatoon Blades WHL 63 4 24 28 0.444 0.2162 0.2162 1.0855 1.0855
2020-21 Saskatoon Blades WHL 18 2 10 12 0.667 0.3243 0.3243 1.6285 1.6285
2021-22 Saskatoon Blades WHL 54 4 41 45 0.833 0.4054 0.3790 2.0355 1.9028
2022-23 Saskatoon Blades WHL 65 12 53 65 1.000 0.4865 0.4321 2.4427 2.1695
2023-24 Univ. of Alberta USports-M 10 1 10 11 1.100 0.5804 0.6179 3.2233 3.4316
2024-25 Univ. of Alberta USports-M 28 7 27 34 1.214 0.6407 0.6513 3.5583 3.6174
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Nebraska Omaha D1 NCHC JR 33 3 10 13 0.394
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.65
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.39
2025-26 · Nebraska Omaha
-39.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

0%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
100%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#877
Defenseman overall
#166
Defenseman born in 2002

D2/3 Comparables

Neil Trimm
Neumann · 2003-04
1.800 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Arkhip Ledenkov
St. Scholastica · 2018-19
1.636 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Brandon Osmundson
Utica · 2018-19
1.448 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.