← New Search ↗ Social Card

Aidan De La Gorgendiere Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2002-02-22 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Saskatoon Blades WHL 1 0 0 0 0.000
2018-19 Saskatoon Blades WHL 47 0 5 5 0.106 0.0518 0.0565 0.2607 0.2842
2019-20 Saskatoon Blades WHL 63 4 24 28 0.444 0.2162 0.2162 1.0889 1.0889
2020-21 Saskatoon Blades WHL 18 2 10 12 0.667 0.3243 0.3243 1.6336 1.6336
2021-22 Saskatoon Blades WHL 54 4 41 45 0.833 0.4054 0.3790 2.0418 1.9087
2022-23 Saskatoon Blades WHL 65 12 53 65 1.000 0.4865 0.4321 2.4503 2.1763
2023-24 Univ. of Alberta usports 10 1 10 11 1.100
2024-25 Univ. of Alberta usports 28 7 27 34 1.214
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Nebraska Omaha D1 NCHC JR 33 3 10 13 0.394
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.39
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.39
2025-26 · Nebraska Omaha
+1.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

25%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
68%
Age-Out / Club
5%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#1575
Defenseman overall
#360
Defenseman born in 2002

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.51 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Providence (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Harvard (0.67 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.55 PPG
→ Cornell (0.20 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.55 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Oswego · 2008-09
1.357 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Lebanon Valley · 2015-16
1.280 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Thomas · 2015-16
0.923 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.