IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Connor McClennon Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-06-25 Country: Canada
2020 · Round 6, Pick #178  ·  Philadelphia Flyers Philadelphia Flyers
Signed Professionally
Univ. of Alberta · USports-M

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Wenatchee Wild WHL 5 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2018-19 Wenatchee Wild WHL 46 14 15 29 0.630 0.3067 0.3395 1.5468 1.7120
2019-20 Wenatchee Wild WHL 42 21 28 49 1.167 0.5676 0.5676 2.8627 2.8627
2020-21 Wenatchee Wild WHL 24 14 19 33 1.375 0.6689 0.6689 3.3738 3.3738
2021-22 Wenatchee Wild WHL 62 43 38 81 1.306 0.6356 0.6049 3.2058 3.0508
2022-23 Wenatchee Wild WHL 64 46 46 92 1.438 0.6993 0.6329 3.5272 3.1922
2023-24 Univ. of Alberta USports-M 8 2 3 5 0.625 0.3297 0.3565 1.8319 1.9811
2024-25 Univ. of Alberta USports-M 22 8 12 20 0.909 0.4796 0.4956 2.6646 2.7536
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Bemidji State D1 CCHA JR 36 11 7 18 0.500
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.38
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.50
2025-26 · Bemidji State
+32.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

12%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
88%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#4112
Forward overall
#153
Forward born in 2002

D2/3 Comparables

Conor Landrigan
Utica · 2016-17
1.038 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Joona Juntunen
Saint Mary's (MN) · 2023-24
0.826 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Ryan Ellis
SUNY Oswego · 2004-05
1.704 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.