← New Search ↗ Social Card

Connor McClennon Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-06-25 Country: Canada
2020 NHL Draft Round 6, Pick #178  ·  Philadelphia Flyers Philadelphia Flyers
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Wenatchee Wild WHL 5 0 0 0 0.000
2018-19 Wenatchee Wild WHL 46 14 15 29 0.630 0.3067 0.3395 1.5447 1.7097
2019-20 Wenatchee Wild WHL 42 21 28 49 1.167 0.5676 0.5676 2.8588 2.8588
2020-21 Wenatchee Wild WHL 24 14 19 33 1.375 0.6689 0.6689 3.3692 3.3692
2021-22 Wenatchee Wild WHL 62 43 38 81 1.306 0.6356 0.6049 3.2013 3.0466
2022-23 Wenatchee Wild WHL 64 46 46 92 1.438 0.6993 0.6329 3.5223 3.1877
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Bemidji State D1 CCHA JR 36 11 7 18 0.500
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.58
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.50
2025-26 · Bemidji State
-13.6% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
62%
Age-Out / Club
22%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#3177
Forward overall
#116
Forward born in 2002
#19
in WHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 1.21 PPG
→ Northeastern (1.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.68 Elite
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.91 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.51 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.33 PPG
→ UMass (0.13 D1 FR PPG)
0.50 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.94 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.52 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.89 PPG
→ Yale
0.50 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Utica · 2018-19
1.448 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Neumann · 2003-04
1.800 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Scholastica · 2018-19
1.636 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.