IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Sean Tschigerl Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-04-11 Country: Canada
2021 · Round 5, Pick #130  ·  Anaheim Ducks Anaheim Ducks
Signed Professionally
Univ. of Alberta · USports-M

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Calgary Hitmen WHL 8 1 0 1 0.125 0.0608 0.0697 0.3067 0.3516
2019-20 Calgary Hitmen WHL 56 4 9 13 0.232 0.1129 0.1129 0.5695 0.5695
2020-21 Calgary Hitmen WHL 21 13 8 21 1.000 0.4865 0.4865 2.4537 2.4537
2021-22 Calgary Hitmen WHL 65 23 35 58 0.892 0.4341 0.4304 2.1894 2.1705
2022-23 Calgary Hitmen WHL 60 27 30 57 0.950 0.4622 0.4366 2.3310 2.2021
2023-24 Calgary Hitmen WHL 63 27 35 62 0.984 0.4788 0.4287 2.4147 2.1622
2024-25 Univ. of Alberta USports-M 26 20 19 39 1.500 0.7914 0.8493 4.3965 4.7179
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Nebraska Omaha D1 NCHC SO 35 5 8 13 0.371
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.63
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.37
2025-26 · Nebraska Omaha
-41.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

⭐ Elite profile — high probability of D1 placement; comparable to top-end prospects
2%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
2%
Age-Out / Club
95%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#3669
Forward overall
#83
Forward born in 2003

D2/3 Comparables

Neil Trimm
Neumann · 2003-04
1.800 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Arkhip Ledenkov
St. Scholastica · 2018-19
1.636 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Brandon Osmundson
Utica · 2018-19
1.448 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.