← New Search ↗ Social Card

Sean Tschigerl Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-04-11 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Calgary Hitmen WHL 8 1 0 1 0.125 0.0608 0.0697 0.3051 0.3498
2019-20 Calgary Hitmen WHL 56 4 9 13 0.232 0.1128 0.1128 0.5665 0.5665
2020-21 Calgary Hitmen WHL 21 13 8 21 1.000 0.4862 0.4862 2.4408 2.4408
2021-22 Calgary Hitmen WHL 65 23 35 58 0.892 0.4338 0.4301 2.1779 2.1591
2022-23 Calgary Hitmen WHL 60 27 30 57 0.950 0.4619 0.4364 2.3188 2.1906
2023-24 WHL 63 27 35 62 0.984 0.4785 0.4285 2.4020 2.1508
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Nebraska Omaha D1 NCHC 35 5 8 13 0.371
2025-26 Omaha D1 NCHC 35 5 8 13 0.371
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.37
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.37
2025-26 · Nebraska Omaha
0.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
85%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#3525
Forward overall
#95
Forward born in 2003
#263
in WHL

D1 Comparables

OHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Maine
0.40 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ RIT (0.65 D1 FR PPG)
0.46 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.38 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.95 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.45 D1 FR PPG)
0.54 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Oswego · 2008-09
1.357 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Thomas · 2015-16
0.923 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Lebanon Valley · 2015-16
1.280 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.