icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2005-06 | Fargo-Moorhead Jets | NAHL | 56 | 17 | 42 | 59 | 1.054 | 0.4174 | 0.4324 | 1.1062 | 1.1460 |
| 2006-07 | Fargo-Moorhead Jets | NAHL | 62 | 20 | 56 | 76 | 1.226 | 0.4857 | 0.4793 | 1.2870 | 1.2700 |
| 2007-08 | Omaha Lancers | USHL | 59 | 26 | 29 | 55 | 0.932 | 0.5730 | 0.5259 | 2.7464 | 2.5204 |
| 2012-13 | Tappara | Liiga | 57 | 19 | 22 | 41 | 0.719 | 1.7983 | 1.9198 | — | — |
| 2013-14 | Tappara | Liiga | 19 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 0.316 | 0.7895 | 0.8140 | — | — |
| 2014-15 | Leksands IF | SHL | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 | — | — | — | — |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011-12 | Boston University | D1 | HockeyEast | — | 38 | 9 | 31 | 40 | 1.053 |
| 2010-11 | Boston University | D1 | HockeyEast | — | 34 | 10 | 18 | 28 | 0.824 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.