← New Search ↗ Social Card

Conner Roulette Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-05-13 Country: Canada
2021 · Round 4, Pick #111  ·  Dallas Stars Dallas Stars
Signed Professionally
Univ. of Saskatchewan · USports-M

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Seattle Thunderbirds WHL 1 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2019-20 Seattle Thunderbirds WHL 54 19 20 39 0.722 0.3514 0.3514 1.7641 1.7641
2020-21 Seattle Thunderbirds WHL 11 6 6 12 1.091 0.5307 0.5307 2.6647 2.6647
2021-22 Seattle Thunderbirds WHL 65 24 42 66 1.015 0.4940 0.4919 2.4803 2.4698
2022-23 Saskatoon Blades WHL 60 24 39 63 1.050 0.5108 0.4848 2.5648 2.4342
2023-24 Spokane Chiefs WHL 68 45 63 108 1.588 0.7727 0.6953 3.8795 3.4908
2025-26 Univ. of Saskatchewan USports-M 28 15 20 35 1.250 0.6595 0.6749 3.6629 3.7484
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2026-27 Michigan Tech D1 CCHA JR 0 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

0%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
100%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#3403
Forward overall
#75
Forward born in 2003

D2/3 Comparables

Neumann · 2003-04
1.800 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Scholastica · 2018-19
1.636 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Utica · 2018-19
1.448 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.