IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Gregg Rodriguez Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1985-12-20 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2004-05 Capital District Selects EJHL 53 1 8 9 0.170 0.0503 0.0501 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 University of Kentucky ACHA_D1 — — 27 11 11 22 0.815
2024-25 University of Kentucky ACHA_D1 — — 27 11 11 22 0.815
2023-24 University of Kentucky ACHA_D1 — — 27 11 11 22 0.815
2022-23 University of Kentucky ACHA_D1 — — 27 11 11 22 0.815
2021-22 University of Kentucky ACHA_D1 — — 27 11 11 22 0.815
2020-21 University of Kentucky ACHA_D1 — — 27 11 11 22 0.815
2009-10 Sacred Heart D1 AHA SR 34 1 5 6 0.176
2008-09 Sacred Heart D1 AHA JR 37 1 3 4 0.108
2007-08 Sacred Heart D1 AHA SO 30 1 3 4 0.133
2006-07 Sacred Heart D1 AHA FR 4 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#26076
Defenseman overall
#1808
Defenseman born in 1985
#423
in EJHL

D1 Comparables

Richard Buri
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.04 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.02 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Cliff Watson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ Michigan Tech (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Niklas Folin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Mike Preston
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.07 PPG
→ Army (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Sam Piazza
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG
→ Michigan (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.