icepath.io · Hockey Analytics

← New Search ↗ Social Card

Paul Thompson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1988-11-30 Country: USA

Set Commitment

School

Type

Date (optional)

Detected conference: () — projections will update automatically.

Notes (optional)

Projecting as:

Show:

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory

Dashed = raw PPG · ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG · ■ Green = actual college PPG

Junior Seasons

Season	Team	League	GP	G	A	Pts	PPG	NCAAe-PPG	Age-Adj	D3e-PPG	Age-Adj
2005-06	New Hampshire Jr. Monarchs	EJHL	38	13	17	30	0.789	0.2339	0.2564	—	—

■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor) ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor) COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Seasons (Historical)

Season	School	Div	Conference	Year	GP	G	A	Pts	PPG
2010-11	New Hampshire	D1	HockeyEast	SR	39	28	24	52	1.333
2009-10	New Hampshire	D1	HockeyEast	JR	39	19	20	39	1.000
2008-09	New Hampshire	D1	HockeyEast	SO	27	4	5	9	0.333
2007-08	New Hampshire	D1	HockeyEast	FR	35	6	6	12	0.343

Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year

Projected PPG

0.22

before college

→

Actual FR PPG

0.34

2007-08 · New Hampshire

+56.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#23239

Forward overall

#821

Forward born in 1988

#108

in EJHL

D1 Comparables

Joe Snively

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG

→ Yale (0.88 D1 FR PPG)

0.22 Elite

NCAAe PPG

Alec Marsh

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG

→ Penn State (0.57 D1 FR PPG)

0.18 Strong

NCAAe PPG

Dylan Pavelek

NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG

→ Michigan State

0.26 No data

NCAAe PPG

Shane Eiserman

NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.35 PPG

→ New Hampshire (0.43 D1 FR PPG)

0.27 Average

NCAAe PPG

Jared Fiegl

NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.30 PPG

→ Cornell (0.04 D1 FR PPG)

0.24 Developing

NCAAe PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.