IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Joe Snively Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-01-01 Country: USA
Signed Professionally
Djurgårdens IF · SHL

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Sioux City Musketeers USHL 48 9 7 16 0.333 0.2049 0.2215 0.9820 1.0614
2013-14 Sioux City Musketeers USHL 56 14 31 45 0.804 0.4940 0.5108 2.3676 2.4482
2014-15 Sioux City Musketeers USHL 55 27 37 64 1.164 0.7153 0.7045 3.4282 3.3763
2025-26 Djurgårdens IF SHL 52 15 24 39 0.750 1.8750 1.8750 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Yale D1 ECAC SR 33 15 21 36 1.091
2017-18 Yale D1 ECAC JR 31 19 17 36 1.161
2016-17 Yale D1 ECAC SO 33 14 25 39 1.182
2015-16 Yale D1 ECAC FR 32 10 18 28 0.875
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.58
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.88
2015-16 · Yale
+49.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 39 comparables)

🏒 NHL / Pro Track — production profile is consistent with players who bypassed or minimized college hockey
0%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
100%
NHL / Pro

NCAAe Rankings

D2/3 Comparables

Arkhip Ledenkov
St. Scholastica · 2018-19
1.636 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Neil Trimm
Neumann · 2003-04
1.800 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Filimon Ledenkov
St. Scholastica · 2018-19
1.636 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.