← Women's Search ↗ Social Card

Audrey Davis Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2009-07-08 Country: USA Height: 5'7" (170 cm)
NCAA-W Projection
Wisconsin
Verbal WCHA-W D1W

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I Women's

Projected PPG — WCHA-W
0.21
Developing (<0.25)
Base NCAAe-W PPG0.2431
Conf. Strength0.997
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencehigh
Seasons Used2

NCAA D3W

Projected PPG — Division Avg
0.55
Average (0.35–0.65)
Base D3e-W PPG0.6441
Conf. Strength1.000
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencehigh
Seasons Used2

D1W / D3W Likelihood

20%
NCAA D1W
18%
NCAA D3W
62%
Club / Other

Based on 40 comparable players

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid = age-adjusted NCAAe-W PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG

Pre-College Seasons

Most women's college players come directly from high school hockey. Junior or HS season stats below (when available on Elite Prospects).

SeasonTeamLeagueGP GAPtsPPG NCAAe-W PPGAge-Adjusted
2023-24 16U-AAA-W 4 2 0 2 0.500 0.1786 0.1786
2024-25 Edina High USHS-MN-W 26 13 23 36 1.385 0.2091 0.2181
2025-26 16U-AAA-W 11 6 2 8 0.727 0.2598 0.2598
NCAAe-W = points/game translated to NCAA-W equivalent  ·  COVID-flagged seasons in yellow

Historical Comparables — NCAA D1W

PlayerLeague · Season · PPG FR College PPGSchool
Emily Gunderson USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.71 PPG 0.171 Lindenwood
Mariah Gardner USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.74 PPG 0.071 Minnesota State
Amy Petersen USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.92 PPG 0.784 Penn State
Paige Voight USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.76 PPG 0.559 Merrimack
Charly Dalhquist USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.68 PPG 0.241 North Dakota

Historical Comparables — NCAA D3W

PlayerJunior Season · PPG FR College PPGSchoolConference
Kaiya Sandy 2024-25 · 1.27 PPG 0.571 Hamline MIAC
Caroline Thomas 2022-23 · 0.67 PPG 1.083 Middlebury NESCAC
Presleigh Giesbrecht 2021-22 · 0.72 PPG 1.000 Post CHA-W
Devin Leary 2007-08 · 1.44 PPG 0.500 Utica UCHC
Emily Olsthoorn 2024-25 · 0.88 PPG 0.818 Colby NESCAC

Women's college hockey projections draw primarily on high school and junior stats when available. Because most women go directly from HS to college, projections with limited pre-college data use conference-based priors.

NCAAe-W factors are derived from historical pre-college→NCAA-W transitions. For many players, projection confidence is lower than men's due to sparse pre-college tracking.