| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006-07 | Cornwall Colts | CCHL | 44 | 18 | 24 | 42 | 0.955 | 0.3048 | 0.3186 | 0.7389 | 0.7723 |
| 2007-08 | Cedar Rapids RoughRiders | USHL | 57 | 12 | 24 | 36 | 0.632 | 0.3882 | 0.3842 | 1.8608 | 1.8417 |
| 2008-09 | Cedar Rapids RoughRiders | USHL | 60 | 17 | 40 | 57 | 0.950 | 0.5840 | 0.5519 | 2.7989 | 2.6450 |
| 2014-15 | MoDo Hockey | SHL | 38 | 4 | 11 | 15 | 0.395 | 0.9868 | 0.9940 | — | — |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012-13 | St. Lawrence | D1 | ECAC | SR | 35 | 15 | 32 | 47 | 1.343 |
| 2011-12 | St. Lawrence | D1 | ECAC | JR | 28 | 14 | 23 | 37 | 1.321 |
| 2010-11 | St. Lawrence | D1 | ECAC | SO | 39 | 12 | 23 | 35 | 0.897 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.