| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2005-06 | Philadelphia Revolution | EJHL | 44 | 14 | 21 | 35 | 0.795 | 0.2357 | 0.2371 | — | — |
| 2007-08 | Green Bay Gamblers | USHL | 57 | 6 | 24 | 30 | 0.526 | 0.3235 | 0.2896 | 1.5506 | 1.3882 |
| 2015-16 | IK Oskarshamn | Allsvenskan | 51 | 4 | 20 | 24 | 0.471 | 1.1765 | 0.9589 | — | — |
| 2016-17 | Starbulls Rosenheim | DEL2 | 40 | 8 | 19 | 27 | 0.675 | 0.2912 | 0.2722 | — | — |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011-12 | RIT | D1 | AHA | SR | 38 | 8 | 23 | 31 | 0.816 |
| 2010-11 | RIT | D1 | AHA | JR | 33 | 6 | 22 | 28 | 0.849 |
| 2009-10 | RIT | D1 | AHA | SO | 40 | 16 | 31 | 47 | 1.175 |
| 2008-09 | RIT | D1 | AHA | FR | 36 | 13 | 19 | 32 | 0.889 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.