← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ethan Peters Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2003-04-22 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Edmonton Oil Kings WHL 23 1 4 5 0.217 0.1058 0.1058 0.5327 0.5327
2021-22 Edmonton Oil Kings WHL 57 2 15 17 0.298 0.1451 0.1441 0.7307 0.7255
2022-23 WHL 71 3 10 13 0.183 0.0891 0.0843 0.4486 0.4245
2023-24 Tri-City Americans WHL 57 1 8 9 0.158 0.0768 0.0689 0.3869 0.3470
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Mercyhurst ACHA_D1 10 1 1 2 0.200
2024-25 Mercyhurst ACHA_D1 10 1 1 2 0.200
2023-24 Mercyhurst ACHA_D1 10 1 1 2 0.200
2022-23 Mercyhurst ACHA_D1 10 1 1 2 0.200
2021-22 Mercyhurst ACHA_D1 10 1 1 2 0.200
2020-21 Mercyhurst ACHA_D1 10 1 1 2 0.200

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

30%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
60%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#17663
Defenseman overall
#3151
Defenseman born in 2003
#2242
in WHL

D1 Comparables

QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

UMass Dartmouth · 2018-19
0.444 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Saint John's · 2013-14
0.522 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Plymouth State · 2017-18
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.