IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ethan Peters Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2003-04-22 Country: Canada
Signed Professionally
Queen's Univ. · USports-M

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Edmonton Oil Kings WHL 23 1 4 5 0.217 0.1058 0.1058 0.5334 0.5334
2021-22 Edmonton Oil Kings WHL 57 2 15 17 0.298 0.1451 0.1441 0.7317 0.7265
2022-23 — WHL 71 3 10 13 0.183 0.0891 0.0843 0.4493 0.4251
2023-24 Tri-City Americans WHL 57 1 8 9 0.158 0.0768 0.0689 0.3874 0.3475
2024-25 Queen's Univ. USports-M 12 0 2 2 0.167 0.0880 0.0946 0.4886 0.5251
2025-26 Queen's Univ. USports-M 19 0 3 3 0.158 0.0833 0.0850 0.4628 0.4723
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Mercyhurst ACHA_D1 AHA — 10 1 1 2 0.200
2024-25 Mercyhurst ACHA_D1 AHA — 10 1 1 2 0.200
2023-24 Mercyhurst ACHA_D1 AHA — 10 1 1 2 0.200
2022-23 Mercyhurst ACHA_D1 AHA — 10 1 1 2 0.200
2021-22 Mercyhurst ACHA_D1 AHA — 10 1 1 2 0.200
2020-21 Mercyhurst ACHA_D1 AHA — 10 1 1 2 0.200

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

2%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
98%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#19450
Defenseman overall
#3343
Defenseman born in 2003

D2/3 Comparables

Colby Jaquet
Utica · 2023-24
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Mathieu Dubuc
Middlebury · 2012-13
1.111 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Simren Sandhu
St. Scholastica · 2009-10
0.360 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.