| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006-07 | Southern Minnesota Express | NAHL | 60 | 3 | 20 | 23 | 0.383 | 0.1519 | 0.1558 | 0.4024 | 0.4127 |
| 2007-08 | Sioux Falls Stampede | USHL | 60 | 4 | 22 | 26 | 0.433 | 0.2663 | 0.2547 | 1.2766 | 1.2212 |
| 2015-16 | Fischtown Pinguins | DEL2 | 50 | 16 | 32 | 48 | 0.960 | 0.4141 | 0.4383 | — | — |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011-12 | Colorado College | D1 | WCHA-orig | — | 36 | 4 | 22 | 26 | 0.722 |
| 2010-11 | Colorado College | D1 | WCHA-orig | — | 45 | 6 | 22 | 28 | 0.622 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.