IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Michael Hill Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1990-06-01 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2008-09 Wichita Falls Wildcats NAHL 12 2 3 5 0.417 0.1531 0.1578 0.4398 0.4534
2009-10 Amarillo Wranglers NAHL 46 31 23 54 1.174 0.4313 0.4273 1.2391 1.2275
2010-11 Amarillo Wranglers NAHL 43 37 29 66 1.535 0.5639 0.5299 1.6201 1.5225
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2015-16 St. Norbert D3 NCHA — 31 15 11 26 0.839
2014-15 St. Norbert D3 NCHA — 26 20 13 33 1.269
2013-14 St. Norbert D3 NCHA — 29 20 14 34 1.172
2012-13 Saint Mary's (MN) D3 MIAC — 20 12 12 24 1.200
2011-12 Alaska Fairbanks D1 WCHA — 0 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#6603
Forward overall
#296
Forward born in 1990
#67
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Eric Scheid
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.94 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.50 Average
NCAAe PPG
Michael Huntebrinker
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.91 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.49 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Shane Sooth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.95 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.45 D1 FR PPG)
0.50 Average
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Wahlin
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.33 PPG
→ UMass (0.13 D1 FR PPG)
0.46 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Todd Skirving
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ RIT (0.65 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jake Cox
Southern New Hampshire · 2017-18
0.808 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Ryan Cusin
UMass Boston · 2015-16
1.600 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Paul Rodrigues
SUNY Oswego · 2008-09
0.893 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.