IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Hunter Mayo Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2004-05-07 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Red Deer Rebels WHL 6 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2021-22 Red Deer Rebels WHL 65 3 14 17 0.262 0.1272 0.1329 0.6408 0.6696
2022-23 Red Deer Rebels WHL 67 18 24 42 0.627 0.3050 0.3045 1.5361 1.5336
2023-24 Red Deer Rebels WHL 53 10 25 35 0.660 0.3213 0.3050 1.6182 1.5359
2024-25 Swift Current Broncos WHL 60 19 30 49 0.817 0.3973 0.3559 2.0012 1.7925
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Merrimack D1 HockeyEast FR 20 1 5 6 0.300
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.32
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.30
2025-26 · Merrimack
-5.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

10%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
88%
Age-Out / Club
2%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#2259
Defenseman overall
#500
Defenseman born in 2004
#628
in WHL

D1 Comparables

Paul LaDue
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.51 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Benjamin Gallacher
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Nolan Valleau
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bowling Green
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Matt Van Voorhis
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Denver (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Barrett Kaib
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Providence (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.33 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Quinn Waller
Adrian · 2006-07
1.586 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Luke Moodie
SUNY Oswego · 2008-09
0.926 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Michael Padgeon
Anna Maria · 2018-19
0.706 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.