← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jake Gudelj Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-12-05 Country: Canada
Princeton
ECAC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Spokane Chiefs WHL 51 3 3 6 0.118 0.0572 0.0643 0.2886 0.3244
2022-23 Spokane Chiefs WHL 68 8 8 16 0.235 0.1145 0.1234 0.5774 0.6221
2023-24 Tri-City Americans WHL 16 3 4 7 0.438 0.2128 0.2188 1.0735 1.1036
2024-25 Tri-City Americans WHL 62 14 19 33 0.532 0.2590 0.2524 1.3061 1.2730
2025-26 Tri-City Americans WHL 65 11 29 40 0.615 0.2994 0.2780 1.5100 1.4018
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

35%
NCAA D1
10%
NCAA D2/D3
35%
Age-Out / Club
20%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#19532
Forward overall
#1042
Forward born in 2005
#715
in WHL

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.63 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Princeton (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Average
NCAAe PPG

Princeton Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

NE-Prep 2019-20
0.47
actual FR PPG at Princeton
NE-Prep 2018-19
0.26
actual FR PPG at Princeton
NE-Prep 2021-22
0.00
actual FR PPG at Princeton
NE-Prep 2018-19
0.19
actual FR PPG at Princeton

D2/3 Comparables

Wisconsin-Superior · 2000-01
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Stout · 2005-06
1.286 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Nichols · 2013-14
0.704 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.