IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Scott Cuthrell Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1993-12-16 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Cleveland Jr. Lumberjacks NA3HL 46 47 41 88 1.913 0.2305 0.2293 0.6043 0.6012
2013-14 — NAHL 53 16 22 38 0.717 0.2662 0.2575 0.7592 0.7343
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 Nichols D3 CNE SR 30 13 32 45 1.500
2016-17 Nichols D3 CNE JR 27 11 20 31 1.148
2015-16 Nichols D3 CNE SO 27 8 8 16 0.593
2014-15 Nichols D3 CNE FR 27 6 13 19 0.704
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.21
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.70
2014-15 · Nichols
+233.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#14442
Forward overall
#533
Forward born in 1993

D1 Comparables

Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Evan Ritt
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Denver
0.24 No data
NCAAe PPG
Ian Miller
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Sean Farley
Utica · 2006-07
0.571 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Anthony Ruberto
Hamilton · 2008-09
0.440 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Caleb Serre
Wisconsin-Stout · 2018-19
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.