| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-19 | Noble & Greenough | NE-Prep | 29 | 25 | 20 | 45 | 1.552 | 0.4377 | 0.4377 | 0.7101 | 0.7101 |
| 2019-20 | Noble & Greenough | NE-Prep | 27 | 20 | 12 | 32 | 1.185 | 0.3343 | 0.3343 | 0.5423 | 0.5423 |
| 2020-21 | Minnesota Magicians | NAHL | 35 | 10 | 19 | 29 | 0.829 | 0.3283 | 0.3283 | 0.8699 | 0.8699 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | New Hampshire | D1 | HockeyEast | — | 7 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.143 |
| 2024-25 | Princeton | D1 | ECAC | SR | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 |
| 2023-24 | Princeton | D1 | ECAC | JR | 26 | 11 | 8 | 19 | 0.731 |
| 2022-23 | Princeton | D1 | ECAC | SO | 32 | 12 | 6 | 18 | 0.562 |
| 2021-22 | Princeton | D1 | ECAC | FR | 23 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 0.261 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.