← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jack Cronin Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-03-31 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Noble & Greenough NE-Prep 29 25 20 45 1.552 0.4377 0.4377 0.7101 0.7101
2019-20 Noble & Greenough NE-Prep 27 20 12 32 1.185 0.3343 0.3343 0.5423 0.5423
2020-21 Minnesota Magicians NAHL 35 10 19 29 0.829 0.3283 0.3283 0.8699 0.8699
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 New Hampshire D1 HockeyEast 7 0 1 1 0.143
2024-25 Princeton D1 ECAC SR 0 0 0 0 0.000
2023-24 Princeton D1 ECAC JR 26 11 8 19 0.731
2022-23 Princeton D1 ECAC SO 32 12 6 18 0.562
2021-22 Princeton D1 ECAC FR 23 2 4 6 0.261
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.32
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.26
2021-22 · Princeton
-18.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

8%
NCAA D2/D3
2%
Club / ACHA
52%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#11335
Forward overall
#492
Forward born in 2001

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.77 D1 FR PPG)
0.33 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Michigan (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ New Hampshire (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.69 PPG
→ Michigan (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Marian · 2006-07
1.333 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Concordia · 2011-12
0.769 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2016-17
0.720 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.