Patrick Wiercioch Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1990-09-12 Country: Canada

2008 · Round 2, Pick #42 ·

Ottawa Senators

Set Commitment

School

Type

Date (optional)

Detected conference: () — projections will update automatically.

Notes (optional)

Projecting as:

Show:

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory

Dashed = raw PPG · ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG · ■ Green = actual college PPG

Junior Seasons

Season	Team	League	GP	G	A	Pts	PPG	NCAAe-PPG	Age-Adj	D3e-PPG	Age-Adj
2006-07	Coquitlam Express	BCHL	42	9	16	25	0.595	0.2293	0.2612	0.8662	0.9869
2007-08	Omaha Lancers	USHL	40	3	18	21	0.525	0.3097	0.3329	1.5768	1.6947
2018-19	Dinamo Minsk	KHL	59	8	17	25	0.424	1.0593	1.0182	5.8380	5.6115
2020-21	Timrå IK	Allsvenskan	11	0	7	7	0.636	1.5910	1.5910	5.9706	5.9706

■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor) ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor) COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Seasons (Historical)

Season	School	Div	Conference	Year	GP	G	A	Pts	PPG
2009-10	Denver	D1	NCHC	SO	39	6	21	27	0.692
2008-09	Denver	D1	NCHC	FR	36	12	23	35	0.972

Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year

Projected PPG

0.29

before college

→

Actual FR PPG

0.97

2008-09 · Denver

+238.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 16 comparables)

🏒 NHL / Pro Track — production profile is consistent with players who bypassed or minimized college hockey

NCAA D1

NCAA D2/D3

100%

NHL / Pro

NCAAe Rankings

#157

Defenseman overall

#48

Defenseman born in 1990

D2/3 Comparables

Neil Trimm

Neumann · 2003-04

1.800 Elite

actual D2/3 PPG

Arkhip Ledenkov

St. Scholastica · 2018-19

1.636 Elite

actual D2/3 PPG

Brandon Osmundson

Utica · 2018-19

1.448 Elite

actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.