| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007-08 | Waterloo Black Hawks | USHL | 57 | 4 | 14 | 18 | 0.316 | 0.1863 | 0.1841 | 0.9485 | 0.9371 |
| 2016-17 | EC Kassel Huskies | DEL2 | 42 | 3 | 25 | 28 | 0.667 | 0.8931 | 0.9175 | 1.1963 | 1.2290 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011-12 | Vermont | D1 | HockeyEast | SR | 32 | 7 | 16 | 23 | 0.719 |
| 2010-11 | Vermont | D1 | HockeyEast | JR | 34 | 5 | 12 | 17 | 0.500 |
| 2009-10 | Vermont | D1 | HockeyEast | SO | 36 | 4 | 10 | 14 | 0.389 |
| 2008-09 | Vermont | D1 | HockeyEast | FR | 31 | 1 | 9 | 10 | 0.323 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.