IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Bella Sutton Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1996-01-20 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2010-11 Mounds View High (women) USHS-MN-W 24 4 15 19 0.792 0.1271 0.1340 — —
2011-12 Mounds View High (women) USHS-MN-W 25 10 20 30 1.200 0.1927 0.1948 — —
2012-13 Mounds View High (women) USHS-MN-W 25 14 23 37 1.480 0.2377 0.2316 — —
2013-14 Mounds View High (women) USHS-MN-W 26 16 28 44 1.692 0.2718 0.2551 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 Penn State D1 WCHA-W — 35 3 14 17 0.486
2016-17 Penn State D1 WCHA-W — 29 2 11 13 0.448
2015-16 Penn State D1 WCHA-W — 37 4 8 12 0.324
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.23
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.32
2015-16 · Penn State
+39.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#587
Defenseman overall
#111
Defenseman born in 1996
#353
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

Dani Sadek
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.46 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.61 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Linnea Hedin
SDHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Anna Kilponen
SMLIIGA-W · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Grace Bizal
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.16 PPG
→ Boston College (0.27 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Kelsey Cline
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.64 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Dani Sadek
Ohio State ·
0.611 Strong D
actual D2/3 PPG
Linnea Hedin
Minnesota Duluth ·
0.114 Developing D
actual D2/3 PPG
Anna Kilponen
North Dakota ·
0.257 Average D
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.