← New Search ↗ Social Card

Grace Bizal Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1997-05-14 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2010-11 Hopkins/St. Louis Park High (W) USHS-MN-W 24 5 5 10 0.417 0.0669 0.0669
2011-12 Hopkins/St. Louis Park High (W) USHS-MN-W 22 5 14 19 0.864 0.1387 0.1387
2012-13 Hopkins/St. Louis Park High (W) USHS-MN-W 25 10 19 29 1.160 0.1863 0.1863
2013-14 Hopkins/St. Louis Park High (W) USHS-MN-W 23 12 19 31 1.348 0.2165 0.2165
2014-15 Hopkins/St. Louis Park High (W) USHS-MN-W 20 22 9 31 1.550 0.2489 0.2489
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Boston College D1 HEA-W SR 20 2 10 12 0.600
2017-18 Boston College D1 HEA-W JR 36 3 11 14 0.389
2016-17 Boston College D1 HEA-W SO 28 2 13 15 0.536
2015-16 Boston College D1 HEA-W FR 41 0 11 11 0.268
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.22
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.27
2015-16 · Boston College
+20.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#716
Defenseman overall
#133
Defenseman born in 1997
#459
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.46 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.61 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
SMLIIGA-W · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHS-W · 2013-14 · 1.00 PPG
→ RIT (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.08 PPG
→ Harvard (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.08 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.13 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Ohio State ·
0.611 Strong D
actual D2/3 PPG
North Dakota ·
0.257 Average D
actual D2/3 PPG
RIT ·
0.205 Average D
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.