← New Search ↗ Social Card

Linnea Hedin Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1995-01-24 Country: Sweden
Signed Professionally
SDE HF · SDHL

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2010-11 Segeltorps IF SDHL 28 3 9 12 0.429 0.4950 0.6021
2011-12 Segeltorps IF SDHL 28 2 3 5 0.179 0.2063 0.2379
2012-13 AIK SDHL 24 1 3 4 0.167 0.1925 0.2193
2013-14 AIK SDHL 26 1 5 6 0.231 0.2666 0.2981
2018-19 AIK SDHL 30 2 7 9 0.300 0.3465 0.3320
2019-20 AIK SDHL 36 5 2 7 0.194 0.2245 0.2245
2020-21 AIK SDHL 35 2 5 7 0.200 0.2310 0.2310
2021-22 AIK SDHL 33 0 2 2 0.061 0.0700 0.0579
2023-24 SDE HF SDHL 5 0 0 0 0.000
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 Minnesota Duluth D1 WCHA-W 35 0 5 5 0.143
2016-17 Minnesota Duluth D1 WCHA-W 37 2 5 7 0.189
2015-16 Minnesota Duluth D1 WCHA-W 35 1 3 4 0.114
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.25
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.11
2015-16 · Minnesota Duluth
-54.6% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 17 comparables)

0%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
100%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#1470
Defenseman overall
#141
Defenseman born in 1995
#502
in SDHL

D1 Comparables

USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth
0.06 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.35 PPG
→ Harvard (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.06 Average D
NCAAe PPG
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ UConn (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.42 PPG
→ Bemidji State
0.07 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.30 PPG
→ RIT (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Minnesota Duluth ·
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Harvard ·
0.167 Developing D
actual D2/3 PPG
UConn ·
0.348 Average D
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.