← New Search ↗ Social Card

Broc Little Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1988-03-24 Country: USA
Signed Professionally
Linköping HC · SHL

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 AIK SHL 55 16 30 46 0.836 2.0910 2.2767 10.9138 11.8830
2013-14 Jokerit Liiga 15 2 3 5 0.333 0.8332 0.8870 2.8651 3.0501
2014-15 Linköping HC SHL 55 28 19 47 0.855 2.1362 2.0695 11.1500 10.8018
2015-16 Linköping HC SHL 43 21 14 35 0.814 2.0350 1.8546 10.6216 9.6800
2016-17 Linköping HC SHL 52 19 34 53 1.019 2.5480 2.1726 13.2991 11.3398
2018-19 Linköping HC SHL 33 17 12 29 0.879 2.1970 1.6939 11.4671 8.8409
2019-20 Linköping HC SHL 48 24 21 45 0.938 2.3438 2.3438 12.2331 12.2331
2020-21 Linköping HC SHL 31 11 16 27 0.871 2.1775 2.1775 11.3653 11.3653
2021-22 Linköping HC SHL 51 15 14 29 0.569 1.4215 0.9203 7.4194 4.8034
2022-23 Linköping HC SHL 27 13 6 19 0.704 1.7592 1.0973 9.1823 5.7276
2023-24 Linköping HC SHL 52 17 24 41 0.788 1.9712 1.1024 10.2888 5.7541
2024-25 Linköping HC SHL 38 5 12 17 0.447 1.1185 0.5600 5.8379 2.9230
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2010-11 Yale D1 ECAC SR 36 19 24 43 1.194
2009-10 Yale D1 ECAC JR 34 27 14 41 1.206
2008-09 Yale D1 ECAC SO 34 15 20 35 1.029
2007-08 Yale D1 ECAC FR 27 11 12 23 0.852

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

2%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
98%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#409
Forward overall
#10
Forward born in 1988
#125
in SHL

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Oswego · 2004-05
1.704 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Utica · 2016-17
1.038 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Saint Mary's (MN) · 2023-24
0.826 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.