IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Thomas Larkin Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1990-12-31 Country: Italy
2009 · Round 5, Pick #137  ·  Columbus Blue Jackets Columbus Blue Jackets
Signed Professionally
Schwenninger Wild Wings · DEL

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Medvescak Zagreb KHL 34 2 3 5 0.147 0.3678 0.4065 2.0268 2.2398
2016-17 Medvescak Zagreb KHL 58 2 3 5 0.086 0.2155 0.2291 1.1877 1.2629
2018-19 Adler Mannheim DEL 33 6 11 17 0.515 1.2880 1.3463 4.3680 4.5657
2019-20 Adler Mannheim DEL 29 1 8 9 0.310 0.7758 0.7758 2.6308 2.6308
2020-21 Adler Mannheim DEL 35 4 17 21 0.600 1.5000 1.5000 5.0869 5.0869
2021-22 Adler Mannheim DEL 50 6 10 16 0.320 0.8000 0.6926 2.7130 2.3489
2022-23 Adler Mannheim DEL 49 2 11 13 0.265 0.6632 0.5547 2.2493 1.8813
2023-24 Schwenninger Wild Wings DEL 41 4 15 19 0.463 1.1585 0.9095 3.9288 3.0845
2024-25 Schwenninger Wild Wings DEL 42 2 10 12 0.286 0.7143 0.5280 2.4222 1.7904
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2012-13 Colgate D1 ECAC SR 36 3 11 14 0.389
2011-12 Colgate D1 ECAC JR 37 4 10 14 0.378
2010-11 Colgate D1 ECAC SO 41 5 6 11 0.268
2009-10 Colgate D1 ECAC FR 33 3 16 19 0.576

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

10%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
90%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#2162
Defenseman overall
#452
Defenseman born in 1990

D2/3 Comparables

Tim Coffman
Utica · 2023-24
1.480 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Arvega Hovsepyan
Salve Regina · 2023-24
1.385 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Quinn Waller
Adrian · 2006-07
1.586 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.