← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tyus Sparks Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2008-01-04 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 Vancouver Giants WHL 53 11 6 17 0.321 0.1560 0.1683 0.7830 0.8446
2025-26 WHL 69 28 37 65 0.942 0.4580 0.4729 2.2992 2.3738
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
18%
Age-Out / Club
62%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#8337
Forward overall
#120
Forward born in 2008
#716
in WHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG
→ New Hampshire (0.43 D1 FR PPG)
0.48 Average
NCAAe PPG
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Yale (0.48 D1 FR PPG)
0.49 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.62 PPG
→ Michigan (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.98 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.90 D1 FR PPG)
0.39 Elite
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Michigan (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Southern New Hampshire · 2016-17
0.593 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Elmira · 2014-15
0.800 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Curry · 2006-07
1.769 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.