← New Search ↗ Social Card

Zach Budish Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1991-05-09 Country: USA
2009 · Round 2, Pick #41  ·  Nashville Predators Nashville Predators
Signed Professionally
Västerviks IK · Allsvenskan

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Jukurit Liiga 60 15 23 38 0.633 1.5833 1.6502 5.4439 5.6739
2017-18 Liiga 57 20 19 39 0.684 1.7105 1.6652 5.8815 5.7258
2018-19 TPS Liiga 59 20 18 38 0.644 1.6102 1.5073 5.5367 5.1830
2019-20 TPS Liiga 44 8 14 22 0.500 1.2500 1.2500 4.2980 4.2980
2020-21 Västerviks IK Allsvenskan 17 6 5 11 0.647 1.6178 1.6178 6.0710 6.0710
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2012-13 Minnesota D1 WCHA-orig 40 14 22 36 0.900
2011-12 Minnesota D1 WCHA-orig 43 12 23 35 0.814
2010-11 Minnesota D1 WCHA-orig 7 2 4 6 0.857

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 20 comparables)

🏒 NHL / Pro Track — production profile is consistent with players who bypassed or minimized college hockey
0%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
100%
NHL / Pro

NCAAe Rankings

#456
Forward overall
#22
Forward born in 1991

D2/3 Comparables

Neumann · 2003-04
1.800 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Scholastica · 2018-19
1.636 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Utica · 2018-19
1.448 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.