| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-18 | Ässät | Liiga | 57 | 17 | 18 | 35 | 0.614 | 1.5350 | 1.4296 | — | — |
| 2018-19 | Straubing Tigers | DEL | 52 | 13 | 20 | 33 | 0.635 | 0.6940 | 0.7084 | — | — |
| 2019-20 | Straubing Tigers | DEL | 42 | 13 | 18 | 31 | 0.738 | 0.8072 | 0.8072 | — | — |
| 2020-21 | Straubing Tigers | DEL | 37 | 9 | 17 | 26 | 0.703 | 0.7685 | 0.7685 | — | — |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012-13 | Yale | D1 | ECAC | — | 37 | 15 | 14 | 29 | 0.784 |
| 2011-12 | Yale | D1 | ECAC | — | 35 | 19 | 14 | 33 | 0.943 |
| 2010-11 | Yale | D1 | ECAC | — | 25 | 5 | 8 | 13 | 0.520 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.