| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-19 | Ässät U20 | SM-Liiga-Jr | 45 | 8 | 10 | 18 | 0.400 | 0.2168 | 0.2259 | 0.6049 | 0.6304 |
| 2019-20 | Ässät U20 | SM-Liiga-Jr | 51 | 27 | 21 | 48 | 0.941 | 0.5101 | 0.5101 | 1.4234 | 1.4234 |
| 2021-22 | Ässät U20 | SM-Liiga-Jr | 31 | 19 | 17 | 36 | 1.161 | 0.6294 | 0.5602 | 1.7562 | 1.5632 |
| 2022-23 | Ässät | Liiga | 44 | 3 | 5 | 8 | 0.182 | 0.4545 | 0.5375 | 1.5628 | 1.8480 |
| 2023-24 | Ässät | Liiga | 33 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.121 | 0.3030 | 0.3487 | 1.0418 | 1.1989 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-21 | Canisius | D1 | AHA | — | 17 | 4 | 3 | 7 | 0.412 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.