| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008-09 | Omaha Lancers | USHL | 54 | 23 | 34 | 57 | 1.056 | 0.6489 | 0.6646 | 3.1100 | 3.1851 |
| 2015-16 | Ässät | Liiga | 56 | 10 | 15 | 25 | 0.446 | 1.1160 | 1.1798 | — | — |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012-13 | Boston College | D1 | HockeyEast | — | 38 | 16 | 27 | 43 | 1.132 |
| 2011-12 | Boston College | D1 | HockeyEast | — | 44 | 10 | 29 | 39 | 0.886 |
| 2010-11 | Boston College | D1 | HockeyEast | — | 39 | 8 | 21 | 29 | 0.744 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.