IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Danny Kristo Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1990-06-18 Country: USA
Signed Professionally
Västerviks IK · Allsvenskan

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2006-07 U.S. National U17 Team NTDP-U18 59 12 16 28 0.475 0.3680 0.3835 1.7664 1.8406
2007-08 — NTDP-U18 57 22 18 40 0.702 0.5442 0.5361 2.6120 2.5731
2008-09 Omaha Lancers USHL 50 22 35 57 1.140 0.7008 0.7136 3.3587 3.4200
2017-18 Dinamo Riga KHL 42 8 13 21 0.500 1.2500 1.2421 — —
2018-19 Brynäs IF SHL 10 0 4 4 0.400 1.0000 0.8827 — —
2020-21 Shanghai Dragons KHL 14 4 0 4 0.286 0.7143 0.7143 — —
2021-22 Västerviks IK Allsvenskan 15 4 5 9 0.600 1.5000 1.0447 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2012-13 North Dakota D1 WCHA-orig SR 40 26 26 52 1.300
2011-12 North Dakota D1 WCHA-orig JR 42 19 26 45 1.071
2010-11 North Dakota D1 WCHA-orig SO 34 8 20 28 0.824
2009-10 North Dakota D1 — FR 41 15 21 36 0.878
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.60
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.88
2009-10 · North Dakota
+46.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

🏒 NHL / Pro Track — production profile is consistent with players who bypassed or minimized college hockey
0%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
100%
NHL / Pro

NCAAe Rankings

#1273
Forward overall
#64
Forward born in 1990

D2/3 Comparables

Arkhip Ledenkov
St. Scholastica · 2018-19
1.636 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Neil Trimm
Neumann · 2003-04
1.800 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Filimon Ledenkov
St. Scholastica · 2018-19
1.636 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.