icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010-11 | Noble & Greenough | NE-Prep-Girls | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 | — | — | — | — |
| 2011-12 | Noble & Greenough | NE-Prep-Girls | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 | — | — | — | — |
| 2012-13 | Noble & Greenough | NE-Prep-Girls | 28 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0.040 | 0.0184 | 0.0184 | — | — |
| 2013-14 | Noble & Greenough | NE-Prep-Girls | 30 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 | — | — | — | — |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-18 | Harvard | D1 | ECAC-W | SR | 31 | 5 | 12 | 17 | 0.548 |
| 2016-17 | Harvard | D1 | ECAC-W | JR | 29 | 9 | 4 | 13 | 0.448 |
| 2015-16 | Harvard | D1 | ECAC-W | SO | 21 | 1 | 9 | 10 | 0.476 |
| 2014-15 | Harvard | D1 | ECAC-W | FR | 36 | 5 | 6 | 11 | 0.306 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.