IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Philip Samuelsson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1991-07-26 Country: Sweden
2009 · Round 2, Pick #61  ·  Pittsburgh Penguins Pittsburgh Penguins
Signed Professionally
Straubing Tigers · DEL

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2008-09 Chicago Steel USHL 54 0 22 22 0.407 0.2403 0.2579 1.2236 1.3135
2019-20 Leksands IF SHL 42 1 6 7 0.167 0.4167 0.4167 2.1752 2.1752
2020-21 IK Oskarshamn SHL 52 1 12 13 0.250 0.6250 0.6250 3.2622 3.2622
2021-22 IK Oskarshamn SHL 52 2 8 10 0.192 0.4808 0.3915 2.5092 2.0431
2022-23 Fischtown Pinguins DEL 47 4 27 31 0.660 1.6490 1.4260 5.5922 4.8358
2023-24 Straubing Tigers DEL 49 4 12 16 0.327 0.8163 0.6640 2.7681 2.2517
2024-25 Straubing Tigers DEL 46 7 17 24 0.522 1.3043 1.0011 4.4231 3.3948
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2010-11 Boston College D1 HockeyEast — 39 4 12 16 0.410
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.24
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.41
2010-11 · Boston College
+68.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

🏒 NHL / Pro Track — production profile is consistent with players who bypassed or minimized college hockey
0%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
100%
NHL / Pro

NCAAe Rankings

#1037
Defenseman overall
#224
Defenseman born in 1991

D2/3 Comparables

Neil Trimm
Neumann · 2003-04
1.800 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Arkhip Ledenkov
St. Scholastica · 2018-19
1.636 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Brandon Osmundson
Utica · 2018-19
1.448 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.