IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Christine Valente

Position: Forward DOB: 1992-03-01 Country: ?
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2008-09 Choate NE-Prep-Girls 26 10 16 26 1.000 0.4601 0.4601 — —
2009-10 Choate NE-Prep-Girls 22 5 7 12 0.550 0.2531 0.2531 — —
2010-11 Choate NE-Prep-Girls 13 16 13 29 2.230 1.0260 1.0260 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2014-15 Union D1 ECAC-W SR 34 5 8 13 0.382
2013-14 Union D1 ECAC-W JR 34 5 14 19 0.559
2012-13 Union D1 ECAC-W SO 34 5 7 12 0.353
2011-12 Union D1 ECAC-W FR 34 5 7 12 0.353
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.67
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.35
2011-12 · Union
-47.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#284
Forward overall
#19
Forward born in 1992
#31
in NE-Prep-Girls

D1 Comparables

Shayna Tomlinson
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 2.08 PPG
→ Rensselaer (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.96 Average
NCAAe PPG
Caitrin Lonergan
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 2.44 PPG
→ Boston College (0.89 D1 FR PPG)
1.12 Elite
NCAAe PPG
Brooke Avery
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 2.00 PPG
→ New Hampshire (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.92 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Theresa Knutson
USHS-W · 2013-14 · 3.95 PPG
→ UConn (0.39 D1 FR PPG)
1.06 Average
NCAAe PPG
Maria Lindh
SDHL · 2012-13 · 0.71 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.88 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Shayna Tomlinson
Rensselaer ·
0.531 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Caitrin Lonergan
Boston College ·
0.892 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Brooke Avery
New Hampshire ·
0.062 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.