← New Search ↗ Social Card

Adam Schmidt Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1990-11-16 Country: USA
Signed Professionally
Tingsryds AIF · Allsvenskan

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2008-09 Sioux City Musketeers USHL 49 5 9 14 0.286 0.1685 0.1751 0.8581 0.8915
2009-10 Sioux City Musketeers USHL 60 12 27 39 0.650 0.3834 0.3738 1.9522 1.9032
2014-15 HC Vita Hästen Allsvenskan 50 15 9 24 0.480 1.2000 1.2914 4.5033 4.8462
2015-16 HC Vita Hästen Allsvenskan 52 19 19 38 0.731 1.8270 1.8333 6.8563 6.8800
2016-17 Tingsryds AIF Allsvenskan 49 12 8 20 0.408 1.0205 0.9687 3.8297 3.6351
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2013-14 Holy Cross D1 AHA SR 39 14 15 29 0.744
2012-13 Holy Cross D1 AHA JR 36 14 11 25 0.694
2011-12 Holy Cross D1 AHA SO 38 18 19 37 0.974
2010-11 Holy Cross D1 AHA FR 37 6 15 21 0.568
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.25
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.57
2010-11 · Holy Cross
+125.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#734
Forward overall
#35
Forward born in 1990

D2/3 Comparables

Neumann · 2003-04
1.800 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Scholastica · 2018-19
1.636 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Utica · 2018-19
1.448 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.