IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Cassie Hunter

Position: Defense DOB: ⚠ Missing — add in admin Country: ?
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2009-10 Northfield Mt. Hermon NE-Prep-Girls 25 9 8 17 0.680 0.4219 0.4219 — —
2010-11 Northfield Mt. Hermon NE-Prep-Girls 6 1 2 3 0.500 0.3103 0.3103 — —
2011-12 Northfield Mt. Hermon NE-Prep-Girls 14 5 6 11 0.790 0.4902 0.4902 — —
2012-13 Northfield Mt. Hermon NE-Prep-Girls 28 7 6 13 0.460 0.2854 0.2854 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 Connecticut College D3 NESCAC SR 14 0 3 3 0.214
2015-16 Connecticut College D3 NESCAC JR 7 0 3 3 0.429
2014-15 Connecticut College D3 NESCAC SO 1 1 0 1 1.000
2013-14 Connecticut College D3 NESCAC FR 9 2 2 4 0.444
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.35
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.44
2013-14 · Connecticut College
+28.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#421
Defenseman overall
#174
in NE-Prep-Girls

D1 Comparables

Dani Sadek
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.38 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.61 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Grace Bizal
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.16 PPG
→ Boston College (0.27 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Kate Hallett
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.08 PPG
→ Harvard (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Katie Robinson
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.08 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.13 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Mekenzie Steffen
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.04 PPG
→ Wisconsin (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Erin Moes
Gustavus Adolphus · 2013-14
0.364 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Jessica Roach
Wisconsin-Eau Claire · 2012-13
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Libby Miner
Middlebury · 2006-07
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.