IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Alain Goulet Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1988-09-22 Country: Canada
2007 · Round 5, Pick #159  ·  Boston Bruins Boston Bruins
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2005-06 Ottawa Jr. Senators CCHL 41 6 14 20 0.488 0.1058 0.1144 0.3774 0.4080
2006-07 Aurora Tigers OJHL 43 10 32 42 0.977 0.2394 0.2448 0.6725 0.6876
2008-09 Gatineau Olympiques QMJHL 32 16 19 35 1.094 0.5374 0.4939 2.9208 2.6846
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2008-09 Nebraska Omaha D1 NCHC SO 17 2 3 5 0.294
2007-08 Nebraska Omaha D1 NCHC FR 37 6 8 14 0.378
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.18
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.38
2007-08 · Nebraska Omaha
+108.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#2118
Defenseman overall
#420
Defenseman born in 1988

D1 Comparables

Paul LaDue
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.51 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Murray
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.74 PPG
→ Hamline (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Lowney
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Matias Cleland
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.62 PPG
→ New Hampshire (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Christopher Miraldo
Westfield State · 2022-23
1.037 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Lucas Signoretti
Buffalo State · 2023-24
1.120 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Ryan Reifler
Elmira · 2017-18
1.067 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.