← Women's Search ↗ Social Card

Samantha Keil Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2008-01-13 Country: Canada
NCAA-W Projection
Concordia
Verbal MIAC D3W

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I Women's

Projected PPG — WCHA-W
0.15
Developing (<0.25)
Base NCAAe-W PPG0.1635
Conf. Strength0.997
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencehigh
Seasons Used2

NCAA D3W

Projected PPG — Division Avg
0.56
Average (0.35–0.65)
Base D3e-W PPG0.5906
Conf. Strength1.000
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencehigh
Seasons Used2

D1W / D3W Likelihood

22%
NCAA D1W
15%
NCAA D3W
62%
Club / Other

Based on 40 comparable players

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid = age-adjusted NCAAe-W PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG

Pre-College Seasons

Most women's college players come directly from high school hockey. Junior or HS season stats below (when available on Elite Prospects).

SeasonTeamLeagueGP GAPtsPPG NCAAe-W PPGAge-Adjusted
2023-24 Nepean Wildcats OWHL-U22 18 0 3 3 0.167 0.0584 0.0613
2024-25 Kingston Jr. Ice Wolves OWHL-U22 42 1 14 15 0.357 0.1251 0.1245
2025-26 Kingston Jr. Ice Wolves OWHL-U22 48 4 23 27 0.562 0.1970 0.1895
NCAAe-W = points/game translated to NCAA-W equivalent  ·  COVID-flagged seasons in yellow

Historical Comparables — NCAA D1W

PlayerLeague · Season · PPG FR College PPGSchool
Kendra Nealey USHS-W · 2013-14 · 2.14 PPG 0.212 Cornell
Grace Bizal USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.35 PPG 0.268 Boston College
Dani Sadek USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.38 PPG 0.611 Ohio State
Kate Hallett USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.08 PPG 0.100 Harvard
Katie Robinson USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.08 PPG 0.129 Minnesota

Historical Comparables — NCAA D3W

PlayerJunior Season · PPG FR College PPGSchoolConference
Madison Kadrlik 2022-23 · 1.08 PPG 0.643 Wisconsin-River Falls WIAC
Maddie Kolbow 2014-15 · 1.08 PPG 0.633 Hamline MIAC
Tory Heller 2011-12 · 1.68 PPG 0.407 Wisconsin-Eau Claire WIAC
Abigail Chamernick 2021-22 · 1.37 PPG 0.500 Hamline MIAC
Samantha O'Brien 2011-12 · 1.71 PPG Augsburg MIAC

Women's college hockey projections draw primarily on high school and junior stats when available. Because most women go directly from HS to college, projections with limited pre-college data use conference-based priors.

NCAAe-W factors are derived from historical pre-college→NCAA-W transitions. For many players, projection confidence is lower than men's due to sparse pre-college tracking.