icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
| Season | Team | League | GP | W | L | SV% | GAA | SO | SVe Factor | Age-Adj SV% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-27 | Youngstown Phantoms | USHL | 3 | 0 | 3 | 74.1% | 6.00 | 0 | 0.9987 | 74.0% |
| 2025-26 | Youngstown Phantoms | USHL | 19 | 12 | 4 | 90.3% | 2.32 | 2 | 0.9987 | 86.3% |
| 2024-25 | Youngstown Phantoms | USHL | 19 | 9 | 6 | 88.1% | 2.76 | 0 | 0.9987 | 87.3% |
| 2023-24 | — | NAHL | 27 | 18 | 8 | 91.3% | 2.19 | 3 | 0.9843 | 95.6% |
Historical goalies with similar age-adjusted SVe profiles who went on to play NCAA D1.
| Name | Junior League | Junior SV% | Adj SVe | College | NCAA SV% | NCAA GAA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jakub Krbecek | USHL | 84.7% | 77.6% | RIT | 89.3% | 3.90 |
| Connor Hasley | USHL | 86.7% | 79.8% | Bentley | 91.0% | 2.95 |
| Mason Kucenski | USHL | 84.9% | 78.3% | St. Lawrence | 82.6% | 8.00 |
| Aaron Matthews | NCDC | 90.7% | 81.4% | Providence | — | — |
| Anton Castro | USHL | 88.6% | 81.1% | Wisconsin | 78.6% | 4.27 |
Historical goalies with similar age-adjusted SVe profiles who went on to play NCAA D2/D3.
| Name | Junior League | Junior SV% | Adj SVe | College | Div | SV% | GAA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chris Branch | USPHL-Premier | 84.7% | 77.4% | Lebanon Valley | D3 | 89.3% | 4.36 |
| Vincent Lamberti | BCHL | 88.8% | 81.2% | Amherst | D3 | 90.2% | 2.47 |
| Pierce Diamond | BCHL | 88.6% | 80.6% | Albertus Magnus | D3 | 89.4% | 3.82 |
| Jeffrey Dreger | MJHL | 86.4% | 82.1% | SUNY Morrisville | D3 | 84.5% | 4.37 |
| Jeffrey Dreger | MJHL | 86.4% | 82.1% | Morrisville | D3 | 84.5% | 4.37 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.