IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Pierce Diamond Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Goalie DOB: 1998-01-27 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

Save % Equivalency
—
Goals Against Average
—
Base SV% —
Year Adj —
Source —
Confidence —

NCAA D3 / D2

Save % Equivalency
—
Goals Against Average
—
Base SV% —
Year Adj —
Source —
Confidence —
Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw SV%  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adj SVe%  ·  ■ Green = actual college SV%
Goalie Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP W L SV% GAA SO SVe Factor Age-Adj SV%
2018-19 — SJHL 24 14 7 91.5% 2.78 2 0.9700 83.8%
2018-19 — BCHL 11 5 6 88.6% 3.34 0 0.9990 82.5%
SVe Factor = save% equivalency relative to NCAA D1 average  ·  COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div GP W L SV% GAA SO
2019-20 Albertus Magnus D3 23 4 17 89.4% 3.82 0
Goalie Comparables (D1)

Historical goalies with similar age-adjusted SVe profiles who went on to play NCAA D1.

Name Junior League Junior SV% Adj SVe College NCAA SV% NCAA GAA
Daniel Hauser WHL 91.3% 83.7% Wisconsin 90.0% 2.49
Thomas Heaney NAHL 90.0% 84.2% UConn 86.7% 4.39
Jacob Zacharewicz NAHL 89.2% 83.4% Brown 86.8% 4.19
Lukas Renaud AJHL 92.4% 83.4% Long Island Univ. 89.7% 2.57
Cullen DeYoung NAHL 91.0% 85.0% Sacred Heart 94.3% 1.73
Goalie Comparables (D2/D3)

Historical goalies with similar age-adjusted SVe profiles who went on to play NCAA D2/D3.

Name Junior League Junior SV% Adj SVe College Div SV% GAA
Nic Tallarico NOJHL 92.1% 83.6% Adrian D3 90.1% 2.46
Blake Bjella USPHL-Premier 91.5% 83.1% Worcester State D3 87.0% 3.54
Josh Nadler AJHL 89.5% 84.2% Hamilton D3 68.8% 12.03
Graham Burke NAHL 86.2% 82.8% Hobart D3 95.1% 1.00
Grant Linville NCDC 88.9% 83.7% SUNY Morrisville D3 88.3% 3.95

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.